Kwame Anthony Appiah Personality Type, MBTI
What is the personality type of Kwame Anthony Appiah? Which MBTI personality type best fits? Personality type for Kwame Anthony Appiah from African Philosophy and what is the personality traits.
ENFJ (2w1)
Kwame Anthony Appiah personality type is ENFJ, which is a rare combination of Extraverted Intuitive Feeling Judging. ENFJs are warm, kind, popular, and very charismatic. They have a special gift for making people feel comfortable around them. They are good at managing people and understand how to motivate people to help them achieve their goals. They are energetic and sociable and enjoy being with people and getting to know them better. ENFJs can often be found in the roles of manager, teacher, manager of personnel, manager of personnel and personnel director, and personnel and personnel director. ENFJs make excellent leaders and they can be inspiring for others. They like to make others happy and enjoy helping them reach their goals. ENFJs can be great motivators and they always know what to say to get people excited about the upcoming project or event. They love trying new things and taking on new challenges. ENFJs won’t hesitate to take on these responsibilities if they think that the new position will help them advance in their careers.
Notable Examples: Barack Obama, Margaret Thatcher, Warren Buffett, Oprah Winfrey, Bill Clinton, Tom Hanks, Bill Gates, Steve Martin
Celebrity and Media Personality
Kwame Akroma-Ampim Kusi Anthony Appiah (/ˈæpiɑː/ AP-ee-ah; born May 8, 1954) is a British-Ghanaian philosopher, cultural theorist, and novelist whose interests include political and moral theory, the philosophy of language and mind, and African intellectual history. Appiah was the Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Philosophy at Princeton University, before moving to New York University (NYU) in 2014. He currently holds an appointment at the NYU Department of Philosophy and NYU's School of Law. Appiah argues that the formative denotation of culture is ultimately preceded by the efficacy of intellectual interchange. From this position, his views on the efficacy of organizations such as UNICEF and Oxfam are notable for their duality: on the one hand he seems to appreciate the immediate action these organizations provide while on the other hand he points out the long-term futility of such intervention.
