What is the personality type of Michael Fordham? Which MBTI personality type best fits? Personality type for Michael Fordham from Psychology & Neuroscience and what is the personality traits.
Michael Fordham personality type is ISFP, because he is highly intuitive and creative, but is often lacking in self-confidence. This makes him highly sensitive to criticism, and it can be hard for him to assert himself.
ISFPs are often quiet and patient, although they do need to let go of their inhibitions occasionally. They are often great listeners, and have a good sense of humour.
ISFPs have a zest for life and a strong desire to help others. They can be very devoted to their loved ones, and have a deep sense of loyalty.
ISFPs are often not very self-confident, and can suffer from low self-esteem. They have a great capacity for empathy, and have a passion for mankind.
ISFPs are often very loyal, but very sensitive to criticism. They have a great capacity for love and warmth, and are also very creative.
ISFPs are often very quiet and gentle. They feel deeply, and have a great capacity for empathy. They can be loyal to those they love, but may become very self-critical if they feel the relationship is not going well. They can be very creative, but can also become quite detached from reality.
Michael Scott Montague Fordham (4 August 1905 – 14 April 1995) was an English child psychiatrist and Jungian analyst. He was a co-editor of the English translation of C.G. Jung's Collected Works. His clinical and theoretical collaboration with psychoanalysts of the object relations school led him to make significant theoretical contributions to what has become known as 'The London School' of analytical psychology in marked contrast to the approach of the C. G. Jung Institute, Zürich. His pioneering research into infancy and childhood led to a new understanding of the self and its relations with the ego. Part of Fordham's legacy is to have shown that the self in its unifying characteristics can transcend the apparently opposing forces that congregate in it and that while engaged in the struggle, it can be exceedingly disruptive both destructively and creatively.