Sally Yates Personality Type, MBTI
What is the personality type of Sally Yates? Which MBTI personality type best fits? Personality type for Sally Yates from Government Usa and what is the personality traits.
ESFJ (1w2)
Sally Yates personality type is ESFJ, which is the daughter of a parent who is an ESFJ. ESFJs are generally the most warm-hearted of all personality types, and their warmth can be felt in their interactions with others. They are generally warm, nurturing, and easy to get along with, but they are not always the most assertive of people. ESFJs are usually very helpful, kind, and friendly people, but they are sometimes shy around strangers.
ESFJs are the "needy" personality type. ESFJs are always looking for ways to help other people, especially other people who are in need. They will go out of their way to help someone even if they have no real obligation to do so. This personality trait can sometimes get in the way of their relationships with others, leaving them feeling that they are being taken advantage of.
ESFJs are often very forgiving of other people's mistakes or flaws. This can make them seem too accepting or too forgiving, but it is actually one of the most important traits in the ESFJ personality type. It is an essential part of their compassion and caring nature.
Sally Quillian Yates (born Sally Caroline Quillian; 1960) is an American lawyer. She was a United States Attorney, later United States Deputy Attorney General, having been appointed to both positions by President Barack Obama, and later was Acting United States Attorney General.
Following the inauguration of President Donald Trump and the departure of Attorney General Loretta Lynch on January 20, 2017, Yates served as Acting Attorney General for 10 days. Trump dismisses her for insubordination on January 30, after she instructed the Justice Department not to make legal arguments defending Executive Order 13769, which temporarily banned the admission of refugees and barred travel from certain Muslim-majority countries (later to include North Korea) on the grounds that terrorists were using the U.S. refugee resettlement program to enter the country.
Rather than defend it, Yates stated the order was neither defensible in court nor consistent with the Constitution.
