What is the personality type of Helena Blavatsky? Which MBTI personality type best fits? Personality type for Helena Blavatsky from Fategr& Order and what is the personality traits.
Helena Blavatsky personality type is ENTP, meaning she is a natural philosopher. Helena's personality type is dominant, which means it is more likely that she will exhibit one or more of the following behaviors:
is a natural philosopher. Helena's personality type is dominant, which means it is more likely that she will exhibit one or more of the following behaviors:
In The Secret Doctrine, Helena describes herself as follows:
It is now possible to say that the being designated by the designation "H. P. Blavatsky" was a human being, a woman, a Russian, a great Russian. In the religious terminology of theosophy she was a disciple of Mahatmas, and a disciple-in-chief. This much may be said without going into details. For the rest she was a woman sincerely devoted, a woman who had a mission, a woman who worked indefatigably, a woman who struggled for what she thought to be right and true, a woman whose name is noised abroad as that of one who has fallen under the ban of "heresy." She was also a woman who was misunderstood; and even those who could not understand her (or rather who did not want to understand her) were her enemies.
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky was a Russian author who co-founded the Theosophical Society in 1875. She gained an international following as the leading theoretician of Theosophy. Born into an aristocratic family of mixed Russian-German descent in Yekaterinoslav, then in the Russian Empire, Blavatsky traveled widely around the empire as a child. Largely self-educated, she developed an interest in Western esotericism during her teenage years. According to her later claims, in 1849 she embarked on a series of world travels, visiting Europe, the Americas, and India. She also claimed that during this period she encountered a group of spiritual adepts, the "Masters of the Ancient Wisdom", who sent her to Shigatse, Tibet, where they trained her to develop a deeper understanding of the synthesis of religion, philosophy, and science. Both contemporary critics and later biographers have argued that some or all of these foreign visits were fictitious, and that she spent this period in Europe.