Marvin Gray Personality Type, MBTI
What is the personality type of Marvin Gray? Which MBTI personality type best fits? Personality type for Marvin Gray from Criminals and what is the personality traits.
ISTJ (8w7)
Marvin Gray personality type is ISTJ, which means that his primary function is Introverted, Sensing, Thinking, Judging. ISTJ's are responsible, logical, and orderly. They are private and have a strong sense of duty.
Marvin Gray is a classic ISTJ. He is serious and quiet in most situations. He is always concerned about others more than himself. He has a good sense of morality. He has respect for the elderly. His goal is to be a good provider and provide for his family. He feels comfortable in the "middle of the road" and wants to stay there as much as possible.
ISTP Personality Type
ISTP's are very direct and straightforward. They get to the point and don't beat around the bush. They are practical and down-to-earth. They like to keep their emotions to themselves, especially their feelings of stress or sadness.
ISTP's enjoy being alone, observing nature, working with their hands, and solving problems. ISTP's don't let the outside world dictate how they feel. When they are in a bad mood, they don't tell anyone or try to be funny.
Marvin Gayle Gray (August 7, 1954 – July 23, 2013) was an American murderer and suspected serial killer who gained fame in the 2000s due to his deviant behavior. Being a powerlifter, Gray, while imprisoned, achieved incredible results in powerlifting, almost breaking world records. Since 1992, relying on his physical strength, he committed several rapes and murders of fellow inmates, which resulted in taking exceptional measures against Gray by putting him in a high-security prison's solitary confinement cell, restriction of movement within the prison and others.
In the 2000s, he was considered the most dangerous prisoner in the state of Colorado, being convicted of 3 murders and suspected in several others, personally confessing to killing 41 people across 8 different states from 1971 to 1992. However, the credibility of his testimony continued to be disputed until his death.
