Liar paradox Personality Type, MBTI
What is the personality type of Liar paradox? Which MBTI personality type best fits? Personality type for Liar paradox from Famous Hypothesis Paradox & Theorems and what is the personality traits.
ENTP (8w7)
Liar paradox personality type is ENTP, INTJ and INFJ.
The Liars are usually very intelligent and capable of making rational judgments. Typically, Liars tend to be extremely logical, despite their reputation for being entirely deceptive. They often believe that everyone is "out to get them." They tend to be suspicious of others: Liars are not likely to trust others easily, and they will almost always have their reasons why they are suspicious. They are often viewed as cold and calculating, but in reality they are just as emotional as any other type. They are often fearful of "being smothered" or controlled by others. They are often very self-conscious and will often lie to themselves and others to avoid this. For example, "I'm a very careful driver, I always drive with my right hand off the wheel" is a classic example of the Liar paradox personality type.
When a Liar sees something that they believe is true, they will not ask any questions or even consider the possibility that it could be false. Instead, they will immediately go out of their way to disprove it. If a Liar sees something that they believe is good, they will not allow that possibility to happen.
In philosophy and logic, the classical liar paradox or liar's paradox or antinomy of the liar is the statement of a liar that they are lying: for instance, declaring that "I am lying". If the liar is indeed lying, then the liar is telling the truth, which means the liar just lied. In "this sentence is a lie" the paradox is strengthened in order to make it amenable to more rigorous logical analysis. It is still generally called the "liar paradox" although abstraction is made precisely from the liar making the statement. Trying to assign to this statement, the strengthened liar, a classical binary truth value leads to a contradiction.
If "this sentence is false" is true, then it is false, but the sentence states that it is false, and if it is false, then it must be true, and so on.
There is no widely-agreed solution to the paradox.
