Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor Personality Type, MBTI
What is the personality type of Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor? Which MBTI personality type best fits? Personality type for Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor from Historical Figures 1500s and what is the personality traits.
INTP (5w4)
Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor personality type is INTP, and his psychological type is ISTP.
Rudolf II’s birth date is June 13, 1552. He was born in Vienna, Austria to Ferdinand II, Holy Roman Emperor and Anna of Bohemia. He’s known as Rudolph II or as the Emperor, as he was crowned as the Holy Roman Emperor on November 20, 1576.
Rudolf II is best known for his patronage of great artists and architects, and the rebuilding of Jerusalem’s Church of the Holy Sepulchre. He’s referred to as “the Habsburg Emperor,” and is considered the founder of the Austrian Empire.
Rudolph’s personality type is INTP, and his psychological type is ISTP.
Rudolph II’s Career
Rudolf II’s career started when he was an infant, when he was appointed Governor of the Habsburg territories in Bohemia. He was later appointed Governor of Bohemia in 1556, but had to give up the post when he became Holy Roman Emperor, succeeding his father in 1564.
Rudolf II (18 July 1552 – 20 January 1612) was Holy Roman Emperor (1576–1612), King of Hungary and Croatia (as Rudolf I, 1572–1608), King of Bohemia (1575–1608/1611) and Archduke of Austria (1576–1608). He was a member of the House of Habsburg. Rudolf's legacy has traditionally been viewed in three ways: an ineffectual ruler whose mistakes led directly to the Thirty Years' War; a great and influential patron of Northern Mannerist art; and an intellectual devotee of occult arts and learning which helped seed what would be called the scientific revolution. Rudolf succeeded his father Maximiliam II on 12 October 1576. In 1583 he moved the court to Prague. Historians have traditionally blamed Rudolf's preoccupation with the arts, occult sciences, and other personal interests as the reason for the political disasters of his reign. More recently historians have re-evaluated this view and see his patronage of the arts and occult sciences as a triumph and key part of the Renaissance.
