What is the personality type of José Guilherme Merquior? Which MBTI personality type best fits? Personality type for José Guilherme Merquior from Latin American Philosophy and what is the personality traits.
José Guilherme Merquior personality type is INTP, which means he has a dominant Introverted Intuition and a secondary Extroverted Intuition. This means that INTPs are usually more concerned with "what if" scenarios, visions of the future, and ideas about the past. They enjoy putting the pieces together and understanding how things work. In contrast, ESTPs are more concerned with "how to" scenarios, gathering information, and making decisions. They enjoy evaluating options and coming up with a good plan. INFJs and ENFJs are the only other personality types that have a dominant Introverted Intuition, which helps explain why they are so drawn to the idea of being an artist.
7. They Are Very Focused on Ideas
INTPs have a lot of difficulty with following orders and following the crowd. In fact, they often live in a world of their own where they can think through things from thousands of different angles. This comes from their dominant Introverted Intuition which leads them to see things from a different perspective. They have a very deep interest in ideas and have a difficult time focusing on practical things like work or school.
José Guilherme Merquior (April 22, 1941 – January 7, 1991) was a Brazilian diplomat, academic, writer, literary critic and philosopher. He was a prolific writer, and member of the Academia Brasileira de Letras (the Brazilian Academy of Letters). He had a doctorate in sociology from the London School of Economics, which was directed by Ernest Gellner. Merquior also studied under Claude Lévi-Strauss (whose ideas Merquior would largely repudiate in From Prague to Paris), and took guidance from the likes of Raymond Aron, Harry Levin, and Arnaldo Momigliano. He published books written directly in French, English, Italian, and his native Portuguese. Merquior divided his published works in two segments. In one the bulk was criticism per se; in the other the emphasis was the history of ideas, or more specific investigations like the highly esteemed study of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Max Weber.