Raymond Smullyan Personality Type, MBTI
What is the personality type of Raymond Smullyan? Which MBTI personality type best fits? Personality type for Raymond Smullyan from Mathematics and what is the personality traits.
INTP (9w8)
Raymond Smullyan personality type is INTP, which means that you are a thinker who craves depth, knowledge, and individuality. You pursue knowledge and truth with a passion and intensity to the point of obsession. But you do not take yourself too seriously. You know your mind is a powerful tool, but you’re also ready to laugh at it whenever the occasion arises. As a result, you can sometimes seem to be a bit of a smart aleck or a know-it-all.
The good news is that you are as curious as can be. And as a result, you tend to be quite creative and inventive because you see the world as a place to be discovered and explored. You’re also dreamy and imaginative, and those qualities can sometimes manifest as daydreaming and day-dreaming and flights of fancy and flights of fancy and flights of fancy.
So, if you find yourself daydreaming about your career or your dreams or the future, don’t worry — you’re not literally flying off into space or literally walking through time (although if you were, that would be pretty cool). Instead, you’re engaging in the INTP’s favorite creative tool: the flight of fancy.
Raymond Merrill Smullyan (May 25, 1919 – February 6, 2017) was an American mathematician, magician, concert pianist, logician, Taoist, and philosopher. He wrote several books about Taoist philosophy, a philosophy he believed neatly solved most or all traditional philosophical problems as well as integrating mathematics, logic, and philosophy into a cohesive whole.
His first career was stage magic. Raymond won a gold medal in a piano competition, aged 12. He left high school to study on his own. He studied mathematics and music at several colleges before receiving a Ph.D. in mathematics from Princeton University. While a Ph.D. student, Smullyan published a paper, showing that Gödelian incompleteness held for formal systems considerably more elementary than that of Gödel's 1931 landmark paper. Smullyan later made a compelling case that much of the fascination with Gödel's theorem should be directed at Tarski's theorem, which is much easier to prove and equally disturbing philosophically.
